Every few months the SEO world gets a new file to argue about. This one is llms.txt. Here is the honest version: it is cheap to add, no major model is confirmed to use it, and your crawler settings matter far more.

What is llms.txt?

llms.txt is a plain-text file you place at yourdomain.com/llms.txt. It lists your most important pages, with short descriptions, in clean Markdown, so an AI tool can find the good stuff without wading through your navigation and cookie banners. Some sites also publish llms-full.txt with the actual content inlined.

It is a community proposal, not an official standard. Google has said it is not using it. OpenAI and Anthropic have not confirmed using it for ranking.

What actually controls AI access

Your robots.txt rules for the AI crawlers do the real work:

BotPurposeCommon choice
GooglebotSearch and AI OverviewsAlways allow
Google-ExtendedGemini grounding and trainingAllow for AI visibility
GPTBot / OAI-SearchBotChatGPT training and searchAllow for ChatGPT citations
PerplexityBotPerplexity indexAllow for Perplexity citations
These decisions have real impact. llms.txt does not, yet.

Should you add one?

  • If your CMS can generate it automatically, add it. Low effort, no downside
  • Do not hand-maintain it for a large site. The cost outweighs any theoretical benefit
  • Do not expect a ranking or citation lift from it
  • Spend the time on robots.txt, page speed and quotable content instead

Bottom line: llms.txt is a nice-to-have that costs almost nothing if automated. It is not a growth tactic. Anyone selling it as one is ahead of the evidence.

Where it stands right now

2023the proposal was published; adoption is growing but confined to tech and docs sites
0major search or AI engines have confirmed using it as a ranking or citation signal
Minutes vs hoursto generate it automatically, versus maintaining it by hand each month on a big site

Mahdi Hassan · Web Developer & Site Speed

If you want it, wire it into the build so it regenerates from your sitemap and page metadata. A hand-kept llms.txt goes stale in a month, and a stale one is worse than none.

Short case study

A documentation-heavy SaaS

The client wanted llms.txt and llms-full.txt for their docs. We generated both from the existing content pipeline and kept measuring AI citations and assistant referrals for three months.

No measurable change in AI visibility. The real lift that quarter came from restructuring the docs answer-first, which we would recommend doing first, every time.

Frequently asked questions

Does Google use llms.txt?

No. Google has publicly said it is not using llms.txt. Treat it as optional housekeeping, not an SEO signal.

Where does the llms.txt file go?

At the root of your domain, at yourdomain.com/llms.txt, the same way robots.txt sits at the root.

Is llms.txt the same as robots.txt?

No. robots.txt controls which crawlers can access your site. llms.txt is a content index that points AI tools to your best pages. Only robots.txt actually enforces anything.

Want this handled for your site?

We turn these frameworks into an execution plan: technical fixes, a content roadmap, and AI-search visibility, prioritised by business impact.